https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184455 Interference under section 264 of the Income-tax Act was declined in relation to disallowance of brokerage, eviction charges and cost of improvements claimed while computing capital gains. The revisional authority held that no relevant material amounting to legal evidence supported the claimed deductions and therefore refused to disturb the assessment order. In the writ petitions, the petitioners did not produce material to dislodge those findings, so no ground for judicial interference was made out and the challenge to the revisional orders failed. en-us Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 11:05:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184455 Interference under section 264 of the Income-tax Act was declined in relation to disallowance of brokerage, eviction charges and cost of improvements claimed while computing capital gains. The revisional authority held that no relevant material amounting to legal evidence supported the claimed deductions and therefore refused to disturb the assessment order. In the writ petitions, the petitioners did not produce material to dislodge those findings, so no ground for judicial interference was made out and the challenge to the revisional orders failed. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184455