https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184453 The Supreme Court found the Board's decision to confirm the appellant in 1969 and place him below juniors in the seniority list unjustified. The Court emphasized that disciplinary actions should not impact seniority and criticized the lack of guidelines for confirmation, highlighting potential arbitrariness in government service. The Court held the Board acted arbitrarily and directed the preparation of a new seniority list placing the appellant correctly. The appeal was allowed to ensure fair and transparent confirmation processes and seniority determinations in government service, preventing unjust treatment of employees. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:24:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184453 The Supreme Court found the Board's decision to confirm the appellant in 1969 and place him below juniors in the seniority list unjustified. The Court emphasized that disciplinary actions should not impact seniority and criticized the lack of guidelines for confirmation, highlighting potential arbitrariness in government service. The Court held the Board acted arbitrarily and directed the preparation of a new seniority list placing the appellant correctly. The appeal was allowed to ensure fair and transparent confirmation processes and seniority determinations in government service, preventing unjust treatment of employees. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184453