<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (8) TMI 75 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184452</link>
    <description>Roller bearing spindles fitted into ring-frames were treated as machinery for development rebate purposes under section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The controlling principle was that &quot;machinery&quot; and &quot;installed&quot; are to be understood in their ordinary sense, and a component of an integrated machine need not function as a separate self-contained unit to qualify. Because the spindle assembly, once fitted, formed a working unit for spinning, the fact that it could not run independently did not exclude it from the allowance. Expenditure on purchase and substitution of old spindles therefore fell within the rebate provision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:19:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (8) TMI 75 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184452</link>
      <description>Roller bearing spindles fitted into ring-frames were treated as machinery for development rebate purposes under section 10(2)(vib) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The controlling principle was that &quot;machinery&quot; and &quot;installed&quot; are to be understood in their ordinary sense, and a component of an integrated machine need not function as a separate self-contained unit to qualify. Because the spindle assembly, once fitted, formed a working unit for spinning, the fact that it could not run independently did not exclude it from the allowance. Expenditure on purchase and substitution of old spindles therefore fell within the rebate provision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>