https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184451 Inclusion of a candidate's name in a select list did not create an indefeasible right to appointment where the recruitment framework left the Government discretion over cadre strength, recruitment method, and vacancies to be filled, and the regulations stated that selection remained subject to further requirements. The Court also found that the final selection process had been validly closed at the relevant stage, so later vacancies were not required to be filled. On the materials before it, the non-filling of those vacancies was not arbitrary or discriminatory, and the separate treatment of reserved vacancies was upheld as a policy decision based on relevant considerations. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:15:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184451 Inclusion of a candidate's name in a select list did not create an indefeasible right to appointment where the recruitment framework left the Government discretion over cadre strength, recruitment method, and vacancies to be filled, and the regulations stated that selection remained subject to further requirements. The Court also found that the final selection process had been validly closed at the relevant stage, so later vacancies were not required to be filled. On the materials before it, the non-filling of those vacancies was not arbitrary or discriminatory, and the separate treatment of reserved vacancies was upheld as a policy decision based on relevant considerations. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184451