https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184450 Pending consideration of a writ petition challenging a commercial tax recovery under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, the HC granted interim protection against recovery subject to the petitioner furnishing adequate security. The Court noted the contention that conflicting single-judge decisions had made the statutory appellate remedy illusory, and it directed notice with time for counter and rejoinder affidavits. The protection was conditioned so that security need not be given in cash or by bank guarantee, and default would automatically vacate the stay. en-us Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jul 2016 10:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184450 Pending consideration of a writ petition challenging a commercial tax recovery under the Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2008, the HC granted interim protection against recovery subject to the petitioner furnishing adequate security. The Court noted the contention that conflicting single-judge decisions had made the statutory appellate remedy illusory, and it directed notice with time for counter and rejoinder affidavits. The protection was conditioned so that security need not be given in cash or by bank guarantee, and default would automatically vacate the stay. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184450