<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 674 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184437</link>
    <description>Ambulance chassis was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 8706.29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 because the Vehicle Research and Development Establishment certificate stated that an ambulance with unfolded stretchers could carry 13 persons excluding the driver. The appellate tribunal recorded this certificate as the basis for classification, linking the vehicle&#039;s passenger capacity to the tariff entry applicable to motor vehicle chassis for ambulances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 16:08:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 674 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184437</link>
      <description>Ambulance chassis was treated as classifiable under sub-heading 8706.29 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 because the Vehicle Research and Development Establishment certificate stated that an ambulance with unfolded stretchers could carry 13 persons excluding the driver. The appellate tribunal recorded this certificate as the basis for classification, linking the vehicle&#039;s passenger capacity to the tariff entry applicable to motor vehicle chassis for ambulances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>