<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 363 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329765</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the denied cenvat credit on various services at the factory level was indeed eligible for both the appellant and the Input Service Distributor (ISD). The Tribunal set aside the denial of credit and directed the calculation of cenvat credit according to Rule 7(d) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The matter was remanded for the specific purpose of determining the correct credit amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 363 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329765</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the denied cenvat credit on various services at the factory level was indeed eligible for both the appellant and the Input Service Distributor (ISD). The Tribunal set aside the denial of credit and directed the calculation of cenvat credit according to Rule 7(d) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The matter was remanded for the specific purpose of determining the correct credit amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329765</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>