<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 358 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329760</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the order-in-appeal upholding the decision of the lower authority regarding non-compliance with mutilation norms specified by the Custom House was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE. The case involved the refusal of clearance for imported goods due to non-compliance, leading to auctioning and subsequent legal proceedings. With the sole proprietor&#039;s demise noted during the proceedings, following legal precedent, it was ruled that duties cannot be recovered from the deceased proprietor&#039;s legal representatives. Consequently, the appeal was deemed abated and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:54:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 358 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329760</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the order-in-appeal upholding the decision of the lower authority regarding non-compliance with mutilation norms specified by the Custom House was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE. The case involved the refusal of clearance for imported goods due to non-compliance, leading to auctioning and subsequent legal proceedings. With the sole proprietor&#039;s demise noted during the proceedings, following legal precedent, it was ruled that duties cannot be recovered from the deceased proprietor&#039;s legal representatives. Consequently, the appeal was deemed abated and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329760</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>