<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 356 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329758</link>
    <description>The Government upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the revision application filed by M/S. Unique Wire Industries. The case involved a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Maritime Commissioner in relation to a rebate claim for exports made from ICD Sabarmati, Ahmedabad. The Government determined that the claim should have been lodged with the appropriate authority based on the location of the factory or warehouse, emphasizing the importance of following prescribed procedures outlined in relevant notifications. As the goods were exported from ICD Sabarmati, the Maritime Commissioner was deemed to lack jurisdiction, leading to the rejection of the rebate claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 15:52:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 356 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329758</link>
      <description>The Government upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), rejecting the revision application filed by M/S. Unique Wire Industries. The case involved a dispute over the jurisdiction of the Maritime Commissioner in relation to a rebate claim for exports made from ICD Sabarmati, Ahmedabad. The Government determined that the claim should have been lodged with the appropriate authority based on the location of the factory or warehouse, emphasizing the importance of following prescribed procedures outlined in relevant notifications. As the goods were exported from ICD Sabarmati, the Maritime Commissioner was deemed to lack jurisdiction, leading to the rejection of the rebate claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>