<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 351 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329753</link>
    <description>Housekeeping services used for factory cleaning and maintenance were treated as input services because the cleaning obligation under the Factories Act formed part of the manufacturing activity, so Cenvat credit was admissible. Credit on supply of drivers under manpower supply service could not be conclusively determined on the available record, so the issue was remanded for fresh factual examination and decision on merits. As the dispute was treated as interpretative, penalty was found unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 351 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329753</link>
      <description>Housekeeping services used for factory cleaning and maintenance were treated as input services because the cleaning obligation under the Factories Act formed part of the manufacturing activity, so Cenvat credit was admissible. Credit on supply of drivers under manpower supply service could not be conclusively determined on the available record, so the issue was remanded for fresh factual examination and decision on merits. As the dispute was treated as interpretative, penalty was found unsustainable and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>