<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329752</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that although the correct assessment under Section 4A rendered the earlier refund erroneous, since the refund was voluntarily repaid with interest and no fraudulent intent was established, the penalty under Section 11AC was unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC due to the lack of merit for such penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 350 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329752</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that although the correct assessment under Section 4A rendered the earlier refund erroneous, since the refund was voluntarily repaid with interest and no fraudulent intent was established, the penalty under Section 11AC was unjustified. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 11AC due to the lack of merit for such penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>