<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4088</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the civil application for condonation of delay, noting the delay was not intentional. The court set aside the order of dismissal of the appeal, considering the lapse on the part of the office of the Counsel for the applicant. The First Appeal was restored to the file, deemed ready for final hearing, and added to the board of final hearing matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43435" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 253 - HIGH COURT BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4088</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the civil application for condonation of delay, noting the delay was not intentional. The court set aside the order of dismissal of the appeal, considering the lapse on the part of the office of the Counsel for the applicant. The First Appeal was restored to the file, deemed ready for final hearing, and added to the board of final hearing matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>