<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329738</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 75,00,000 based on the seized document and circumstantial evidence but deleted the addition of Rs. 2,46,000 related to unexplained investment in the shop. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434334" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 336 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329738</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 75,00,000 based on the seized document and circumstantial evidence but deleted the addition of Rs. 2,46,000 related to unexplained investment in the shop. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>