<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 325 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decisions in all aspects. The expenses for software purchase were deemed revenue expenditure, sundry creditors were considered genuine trade creditors, and the new evidence was admitted in accordance with Rule 46A. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 325 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decisions in all aspects. The expenses for software purchase were deemed revenue expenditure, sundry creditors were considered genuine trade creditors, and the new evidence was admitted in accordance with Rule 46A. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>