<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 324 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329726</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, granting full depreciation for Plant &amp;amp; Machinery. It deleted certain additions under Section 68 for share applications and unsecured loans based on established identities, genuineness, and lack of positive evidence against means. However, additions were upheld for parties where addresses, confirmations, or inquiries were lacking, emphasizing the importance of thorough documentation and verification in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 14:08:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 324 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329726</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, granting full depreciation for Plant &amp;amp; Machinery. It deleted certain additions under Section 68 for share applications and unsecured loans based on established identities, genuineness, and lack of positive evidence against means. However, additions were upheld for parties where addresses, confirmations, or inquiries were lacking, emphasizing the importance of thorough documentation and verification in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329726</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>