<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1276 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184430</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, overturning disallowances and adjustments made by the AO/TPO based on legal precedents. Disallowance of sales promotion expenses was deleted as not applicable for the relevant assessment year. Bank interest on current accounts was excluded from deduction under Section 80HHC. Various incomes were analyzed, with only net interest to be excluded. E-connectivity charges were classified as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal rejected the CUP method for transfer pricing, upholding the segmental TNMM method. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and thorough verification in transfer pricing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1276 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184430</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals, overturning disallowances and adjustments made by the AO/TPO based on legal precedents. Disallowance of sales promotion expenses was deleted as not applicable for the relevant assessment year. Bank interest on current accounts was excluded from deduction under Section 80HHC. Various incomes were analyzed, with only net interest to be excluded. E-connectivity charges were classified as revenue expenditure. The Tribunal rejected the CUP method for transfer pricing, upholding the segmental TNMM method. Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, emphasizing adherence to legal precedents and thorough verification in transfer pricing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>