https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6890 The last seen together doctrine permits an inference against the person last seen with a victim when the time and place proximity make third party intervention implausible; courts nevertheless require clear proof of the foundational facts and corroboration. Where facts lie especially within the accused's knowledge, failure to provide a probable explanation may be treated as an additional link under the burden of proof principles, but lengthy time gaps, uncertain identities, or lack of corroborating evidence render convictions unsafe. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:15:56 +0530 Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:15:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6890 The last seen together doctrine permits an inference against the person last seen with a victim when the time and place proximity make third party intervention implausible; courts nevertheless require clear proof of the foundational facts and corroboration. Where facts lie especially within the accused's knowledge, failure to provide a probable explanation may be treated as an additional link under the burden of proof principles, but lengthy time gaps, uncertain identities, or lack of corroborating evidence render convictions unsafe. Articles Other Topics Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:15:56 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=6890