https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184422 The Supreme Court criticized the 19-year delay in adjudication, emphasizing the importance of timely remedies for industrial peace. It upheld the gratuity scheme principles, stating gratuity as a worker's right. The financial impact on the appellant was deemed insignificant, questioning the necessity of entertaining such cases. The court rejected the appellant's request for a ten-year qualifying period, affirming the tribunal's five-year decision. It supported the use of consolidated wages for gratuity computation and provided clarifications to the tribunal's award. The appellant was directed to pay Rs. 2,000 in costs, promoting settlements for industrial peace. en-us Tue, 01 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 08 Jul 2016 12:07:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184422 The Supreme Court criticized the 19-year delay in adjudication, emphasizing the importance of timely remedies for industrial peace. It upheld the gratuity scheme principles, stating gratuity as a worker's right. The financial impact on the appellant was deemed insignificant, questioning the necessity of entertaining such cases. The court rejected the appellant's request for a ten-year qualifying period, affirming the tribunal's five-year decision. It supported the use of consolidated wages for gratuity computation and provided clarifications to the tribunal's award. The appellant was directed to pay Rs. 2,000 in costs, promoting settlements for industrial peace. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184422