https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184420 The Court held that the claim for dearness allowance was non-justiciable as it was a matter of grace, not a right. Regarding the alleged violation of Article 14 by the Resolution fixing different rates based on pay, the Court found no discrimination within the slabs and emphasized that Article 14 does not allow comparison between laws of different entities. The Court concluded that the Resolution did not breach Article 14, allowing the appeal and dismissing the respondent's petition without costs awarded. en-us Thu, 13 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Jan 2017 14:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184420 The Court held that the claim for dearness allowance was non-justiciable as it was a matter of grace, not a right. Regarding the alleged violation of Article 14 by the Resolution fixing different rates based on pay, the Court found no discrimination within the slabs and emphasized that Article 14 does not allow comparison between laws of different entities. The Court concluded that the Resolution did not breach Article 14, allowing the appeal and dismissing the respondent's petition without costs awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184420