https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184417 The Supreme Court addressed the repugnancy between the Central Act of 1950 and the Punjab Act of 1953, ruling in favor of the Punjab Act. It held that the Punjab Act prevails over the Central Act concerning Shamlat-deh lands, recognizing the agrarian reform nature of the Punjab legislation. The Court emphasized the importance of rural development and equitable land distribution, setting aside the High Court's judgment and allowing the appeal. Justice Chinnappa Reddy concurred, highlighting that the President's assent for agrarian reform does not automatically resolve conflicts with the Central Act. en-us Tue, 09 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Oct 2016 14:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184417 The Supreme Court addressed the repugnancy between the Central Act of 1950 and the Punjab Act of 1953, ruling in favor of the Punjab Act. It held that the Punjab Act prevails over the Central Act concerning Shamlat-deh lands, recognizing the agrarian reform nature of the Punjab legislation. The Court emphasized the importance of rural development and equitable land distribution, setting aside the High Court's judgment and allowing the appeal. Justice Chinnappa Reddy concurred, highlighting that the President's assent for agrarian reform does not automatically resolve conflicts with the Central Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Jul 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184417