<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1101 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184416</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various tax issues, including the classification of differences in payment as capital receipts, applicability of Section 41(1)(a) for remission of liability, and allowability of provisions for warranty claims and interest on share application money. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were supported by legal precedents and principles, resulting in a comprehensive resolution in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1101 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184416</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on various tax issues, including the classification of differences in payment as capital receipts, applicability of Section 41(1)(a) for remission of liability, and allowability of provisions for warranty claims and interest on share application money. The Tribunal&#039;s decisions were supported by legal precedents and principles, resulting in a comprehensive resolution in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>