https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184412 The court overturned the conviction of the appellants under Sections 302 and 201 IPC due to an incomplete chain of circumstantial evidence, investigative lapses, and overreliance on the "last seen theory." Emphasizing the need for a robust evidentiary chain, the court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and ordering the release of the appellants. The judgment highlights the importance of corroborating the "last seen theory" with other evidence and ensuring consistency in cases relying on circumstantial evidence. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:44:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184412 The court overturned the conviction of the appellants under Sections 302 and 201 IPC due to an incomplete chain of circumstantial evidence, investigative lapses, and overreliance on the "last seen theory." Emphasizing the need for a robust evidentiary chain, the court allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and ordering the release of the appellants. The judgment highlights the importance of corroborating the "last seen theory" with other evidence and ensuring consistency in cases relying on circumstantial evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184412