https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184411 The rules governing recruitment required a written test, viva voce, preparation of a merit list of all candidates who secured the prescribed minimum, and publication of the full result. The Supreme Court held that the Public Service Commission's role was limited to assessing candidates and arranging all qualified candidates in order of merit; it could not withhold the names of successful candidates on the assumption that only a limited number of vacancies existed. Appointment was to be made by the Government from the complete merit list, subject only to a conscious and valid decision not to fill all vacancies. As the petitioner's name was wrongly omitted from the truncated list, she was entitled to inclusion in the select list and appointment as a Subordinate Judge. en-us Wed, 17 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:32:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184411 The rules governing recruitment required a written test, viva voce, preparation of a merit list of all candidates who secured the prescribed minimum, and publication of the full result. The Supreme Court held that the Public Service Commission's role was limited to assessing candidates and arranging all qualified candidates in order of merit; it could not withhold the names of successful candidates on the assumption that only a limited number of vacancies existed. Appointment was to be made by the Government from the complete merit list, subject only to a conscious and valid decision not to fill all vacancies. As the petitioner's name was wrongly omitted from the truncated list, she was entitled to inclusion in the select list and appointment as a Subordinate Judge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Sep 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184411