<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 107 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4080</link>
    <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing a miscellaneous petition filed by the Revenue beyond the four-year limitation period as prescribed under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act. As the petition was filed after the stipulated period, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the order passed in the miscellaneous petition and upholding the original order of the Tribunal. The decision emphasized the significance of adhering to statutory limitations and procedural requirements in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 18:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 107 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4080</link>
      <description>The Court held that the Tribunal erred in allowing a miscellaneous petition filed by the Revenue beyond the four-year limitation period as prescribed under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act. As the petition was filed after the stipulated period, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the order passed in the miscellaneous petition and upholding the original order of the Tribunal. The decision emphasized the significance of adhering to statutory limitations and procedural requirements in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>