https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184410 A compromise decree in a partition suit involving minors was not a nullity merely because prior sanction under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC was recorded briefly; the rule makes such a compromise voidable at the minor's option, not automatically ineffective, and the objection failed. The decree could not be avoided on allegations of unfairness, undue influence or coercion without specific pleadings and full particulars, and the evidence did not prove any such vitiating factor. The plaintiffs therefore failed to establish a proper basis for setting aside the compromise decree, and the separate claim concerning omitted properties was left to the pending partition suit. en-us Fri, 04 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 18:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184410 A compromise decree in a partition suit involving minors was not a nullity merely because prior sanction under Order 32 Rule 7 CPC was recorded briefly; the rule makes such a compromise voidable at the minor's option, not automatically ineffective, and the objection failed. The decree could not be avoided on allegations of unfairness, undue influence or coercion without specific pleadings and full particulars, and the evidence did not prove any such vitiating factor. The plaintiffs therefore failed to establish a proper basis for setting aside the compromise decree, and the separate claim concerning omitted properties was left to the pending partition suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184410