<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184406</link>
    <description>Where a murder case rests on circumstantial evidence, the Court held that the accused&#039;s failure to explain facts especially within his knowledge can add an important link under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act. The medical and surrounding evidence showed homicidal strangulation, the deceased had last been seen with the accused, the house was found locked, the bodies were recovered from inside, and the accused remained untraceable until arrest. Although the extra-judicial confession and alleged recoveries were rejected as unreliable, the remaining circumstances formed a complete chain. The acquittal was set aside, the conviction restored, and the sentence modified to life imprisonment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 17:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 660 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184406</link>
      <description>Where a murder case rests on circumstantial evidence, the Court held that the accused&#039;s failure to explain facts especially within his knowledge can add an important link under Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act. The medical and surrounding evidence showed homicidal strangulation, the deceased had last been seen with the accused, the house was found locked, the bodies were recovered from inside, and the accused remained untraceable until arrest. Although the extra-judicial confession and alleged recoveries were rejected as unreliable, the remaining circumstances formed a complete chain. The acquittal was set aside, the conviction restored, and the sentence modified to life imprisonment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>