<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 858 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184404</link>
    <description>Circumstantial evidence can sustain conviction only when each incriminating circumstance is fully proved, the circumstances form a complete chain, and the chain excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Last-seen evidence may support that chain when corroborated by other witnesses, motive, recoveries and relevant conduct. Information disclosed by an accused is admissible only insofar as it distinctly relates to a fact discovered. Reversal of an acquittal may be justified where the trial court failed to properly appreciate material evidence and recoveries, while an acquittal remains undisturbed where acceptable incriminating material is lacking. These principles supported conviction of the principal accused and differentiated the remaining acquitted accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 14:04:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 858 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184404</link>
      <description>Circumstantial evidence can sustain conviction only when each incriminating circumstance is fully proved, the circumstances form a complete chain, and the chain excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. Last-seen evidence may support that chain when corroborated by other witnesses, motive, recoveries and relevant conduct. Information disclosed by an accused is admissible only insofar as it distinctly relates to a fact discovered. Reversal of an acquittal may be justified where the trial court failed to properly appreciate material evidence and recoveries, while an acquittal remains undisturbed where acceptable incriminating material is lacking. These principles supported conviction of the principal accused and differentiated the remaining acquitted accused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>