<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 899 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) to delete the penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld. The judgment emphasizes the importance of disclosing all relevant facts and particulars to avoid penalties for concealment of income. It also underscores that making an incorrect claim in law does not attract penalty provisions under the IT Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434229" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 899 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) to delete the penalty u/s 271(1)(c). The appeal of the revenue was dismissed, and the impugned order was upheld. The judgment emphasizes the importance of disclosing all relevant facts and particulars to avoid penalties for concealment of income. It also underscores that making an incorrect claim in law does not attract penalty provisions under the IT Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>