<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1088 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184402</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeal was dismissed without any substantive legal determination. The order records only the procedural outcome and does not disclose any adjudication on the merits of the Central Excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 13:02:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1088 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184402</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the civil appeal was dismissed without any substantive legal determination. The order records only the procedural outcome and does not disclose any adjudication on the merits of the Central Excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>