<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 522 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184399</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed because the delay was not condoned, leaving the substantive challenge unheard. The order turns entirely on the procedural bar arising from failure to obtain condonation of delay, and no merits determination was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:50:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 522 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184399</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed because the delay was not condoned, leaving the substantive challenge unheard. The order turns entirely on the procedural bar arising from failure to obtain condonation of delay, and no merits determination was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>