<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184398</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat long term capital gain as short term. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the CIT(A)&#039;s view, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair opportunity for the assessee to rebut incriminating material. The assessee was granted exemption under section 54EC for the long term capital gain, highlighting the necessity of prima facie evidence in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:50:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 666 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184398</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to treat long term capital gain as short term. The tribunal found insufficient evidence to support the CIT(A)&#039;s view, emphasizing the importance of providing a fair opportunity for the assessee to rebut incriminating material. The assessee was granted exemption under section 54EC for the long term capital gain, highlighting the necessity of prima facie evidence in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184398</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>