<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant&#039;s Secret Transactions Disqualified from Duty Concessions Due to Lack of Record-Keeping.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30202</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal of goods - Cum-duty benefit - Appellant resorted to clandestine removal and no records were maintained in respect of such clearance. Therefore the duty evaded transactions which have never seen the light of the day deserve no concession of cum duty benefit at all - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:49:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:49:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434214" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant&#039;s Secret Transactions Disqualified from Duty Concessions Due to Lack of Record-Keeping.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30202</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal of goods - Cum-duty benefit - Appellant resorted to clandestine removal and no records were maintained in respect of such clearance. Therefore the duty evaded transactions which have never seen the light of the day deserve no concession of cum duty benefit at all - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:49:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=30202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>