https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329703 The appellate authority upheld the rejection of a rebate claim due to discrepancies in stock register entries. The government remanded the case for thorough verification based on original documents to determine the use of duty-paid inputs in the manufacturing process. The issue of wastage was also remanded for reconsideration based on previous observations. Delays in processing the claim were acknowledged but not determinative. Interest on the rebate claim was deemed supplementary and to be decided in the remand proceedings. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision with both parties given a hearing opportunity. en-us Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:49:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329703 The appellate authority upheld the rejection of a rebate claim due to discrepancies in stock register entries. The government remanded the case for thorough verification based on original documents to determine the use of duty-paid inputs in the manufacturing process. The issue of wastage was also remanded for reconsideration based on previous observations. Delays in processing the claim were acknowledged but not determinative. Interest on the rebate claim was deemed supplementary and to be decided in the remand proceedings. The impugned order was set aside, and the case was remanded for a fresh decision with both parties given a hearing opportunity. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 25 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329703