https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329694 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against dropped duty demand and penalties set aside. The decision emphasized the insufficiency of concrete evidence linking the manufacturing company, M/s JYL, to the alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found that the duty demand based solely on the dealer's turnover was unsubstantiated, leading to the affirmation of the dropped duty demand and penalties set aside. en-us Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329694 The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against dropped duty demand and penalties set aside. The decision emphasized the insufficiency of concrete evidence linking the manufacturing company, M/s JYL, to the alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Tribunal found that the duty demand based solely on the dealer's turnover was unsubstantiated, leading to the affirmation of the dropped duty demand and penalties set aside. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329694