<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (3) TMI 484 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184397</link>
    <description>Central excise dispute reached the Supreme Court in an appeal by the Collector against Jay Engineering Works Ltd., and the Court dismissed the appeal. The record reflects a short order without stated reasoning, so only the dismissal and the central excise context can be stated confidently. No further legal principle, interpretive ruling, or factual determination is disclosed in the supplied text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (3) TMI 484 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184397</link>
      <description>Central excise dispute reached the Supreme Court in an appeal by the Collector against Jay Engineering Works Ltd., and the Court dismissed the appeal. The record reflects a short order without stated reasoning, so only the dismissal and the central excise context can be stated confidently. No further legal principle, interpretive ruling, or factual determination is disclosed in the supplied text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>