<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 216 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4072</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of importers regarding the refund of excess duty paid for the import of Tetracycline. The Tribunal held that the importers were eligible for a refund as they successfully proved that the excess duty paid had not been passed on to customers. The impugned order was set aside, and the importers were granted the refund they were entitled to under Notification No.6/2002.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=43419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 216 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4072</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed the appeal of importers regarding the refund of excess duty paid for the import of Tetracycline. The Tribunal held that the importers were eligible for a refund as they successfully proved that the excess duty paid had not been passed on to customers. The impugned order was set aside, and the importers were granted the refund they were entitled to under Notification No.6/2002.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=4072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>