https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329686 The court declined to interfere with the assessment order challenged by a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006 for the year 2013-14. Despite the petitioner's arguments against the assessment method and penalty imposition, the court emphasized the failure to respond to the Revision Notice, indicating no objection. The court highlighted the petitioner's failure to avail the appellate remedy and advised pursuing the appeal process rather than invoking constitutional provisions prematurely. The petitioner was granted time to file an appeal within thirty days, with liberty to entertain the appeal beyond the statutory limitation period. en-us Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:39:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329686 The court declined to interfere with the assessment order challenged by a registered dealer under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 2006 for the year 2013-14. Despite the petitioner's arguments against the assessment method and penalty imposition, the court emphasized the failure to respond to the Revision Notice, indicating no objection. The court highlighted the petitioner's failure to avail the appellate remedy and advised pursuing the appeal process rather than invoking constitutional provisions prematurely. The petitioner was granted time to file an appeal within thirty days, with liberty to entertain the appeal beyond the statutory limitation period. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329686