<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 276 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329678</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found the change in valuation method of securities to be bona fide and consistent with accounting standards. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowed bonus claim, stating that the payment was made within the stipulated time under the Income Tax Act. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal entirely.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 276 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329678</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It found the change in valuation method of securities to be bona fide and consistent with accounting standards. Additionally, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowed bonus claim, stating that the payment was made within the stipulated time under the Income Tax Act. As a result, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal entirely.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329678</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>