<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329666</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes due to insufficient substantiation of expenses for business purposes by the assessee. The matters were remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh determinations based on complete evidence provided by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of complying with Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act and the need for thorough scrutiny of claims with proper evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 264 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329666</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes due to insufficient substantiation of expenses for business purposes by the assessee. The matters were remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh determinations based on complete evidence provided by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of complying with Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act and the need for thorough scrutiny of claims with proper evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>