<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 260 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all the assessment years (2006-07 to 2009-10), holding that the pharmacy is an integral part of the hospital business and does not require separate books of account. The profits from the pharmacy are eligible for exemption under Section 11, and the assessee did not violate Section 11(4A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 12:15:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 260 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for all the assessment years (2006-07 to 2009-10), holding that the pharmacy is an integral part of the hospital business and does not require separate books of account. The profits from the pharmacy are eligible for exemption under Section 11, and the assessee did not violate Section 11(4A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>