<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (3) TMI 924 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184389</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, the civil appeal was admitted, and no stay was granted in this central excise matter. The order records only these procedural directions and does not decide any substantive issue on liability, classification, or exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:42:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (3) TMI 924 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184389</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, the civil appeal was admitted, and no stay was granted in this central excise matter. The order records only these procedural directions and does not decide any substantive issue on liability, classification, or exemption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>