<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1077 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184379</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, stating that to claim deduction under section 54, the assessee must make the investment within the due date of filing the return under section 139(1), which the assessee failed to do. Therefore, the assessee is not entitled to deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:28:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1077 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184379</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Revenue, stating that to claim deduction under section 54, the assessee must make the investment within the due date of filing the return under section 139(1), which the assessee failed to do. Therefore, the assessee is not entitled to deduction under section 54 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184379</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>