<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1545 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184385</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai directed the AO to delete the penalty imposed on the housing cooperative society, as the Tribunal found no conscious act of concealing income particulars. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act for assessment year 2005-06 was set aside, following a previous tribunal decision with similar circumstances. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was canceled on December 16, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:28:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434101" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1545 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184385</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai directed the AO to delete the penalty imposed on the housing cooperative society, as the Tribunal found no conscious act of concealing income particulars. The penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act for assessment year 2005-06 was set aside, following a previous tribunal decision with similar circumstances. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was canceled on December 16, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>