<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 556 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184374</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, remanding several issues for re-examination by the Assessing Officer. The duty drawback was not taxed as the right to receive it had not accrued. The purchase of know-how was to be capitalized for depreciation. Disallowance of interest under Section 43B was set aside. Depreciation and maintenance expenses on a guest house were allowed. The claim for investment allowance on exchange rate fluctuation was dismissed but could be raised in the next assessment year. Depreciation on technical know-how was remanded for re-examination. Software development charges were treated as revenue expenditure. Entertainment expenditure was adjusted to 35%. An additional ground on investment allowance for foreign exchange fluctuation was admitted for verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 18:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 556 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184374</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed both appeals, remanding several issues for re-examination by the Assessing Officer. The duty drawback was not taxed as the right to receive it had not accrued. The purchase of know-how was to be capitalized for depreciation. Disallowance of interest under Section 43B was set aside. Depreciation and maintenance expenses on a guest house were allowed. The claim for investment allowance on exchange rate fluctuation was dismissed but could be raised in the next assessment year. Depreciation on technical know-how was remanded for re-examination. Software development charges were treated as revenue expenditure. Entertainment expenditure was adjusted to 35%. An additional ground on investment allowance for foreign exchange fluctuation was admitted for verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184374</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>