https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184367 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of cotton yarns. Despite discrepancies in production slips and gate pass figures, lack of concrete evidence of excess stock, production, or sales without duty payment led to the conclusion that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove clandestine activities. The Managing Director's explanations were considered acceptable, but the authorities failed to corroborate the evidence adequately. As a result, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if applicable. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 17:08:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184367 The Tribunal set aside the impugned order in a case involving allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal of cotton yarns. Despite discrepancies in production slips and gate pass figures, lack of concrete evidence of excess stock, production, or sales without duty payment led to the conclusion that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove clandestine activities. The Managing Director's explanations were considered acceptable, but the authorities failed to corroborate the evidence adequately. As a result, the appeal was allowed with consequential relief, if applicable. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 02 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184367