https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184358 An executory arrangement for construction and later hiring of plinths did not create a present lease or transfer any interest in praesenti, so compulsory registration was not required and the absence of a registered lease deed did not defeat a damages claim. Where the defendant induced the plaintiff to raise funds and construct the plinths to agreed specifications, then terminated occupation after taking the benefit of that performance, promissory estoppel and breach of contract principles supported liability in damages. The compensation claim was within limitation because it arose on vacating the premises, and an unexplained reduction in damages was unsustainable where the agreed monthly rent supplied the measure of loss. en-us Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 14:31:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184358 An executory arrangement for construction and later hiring of plinths did not create a present lease or transfer any interest in praesenti, so compulsory registration was not required and the absence of a registered lease deed did not defeat a damages claim. Where the defendant induced the plaintiff to raise funds and construct the plinths to agreed specifications, then terminated occupation after taking the benefit of that performance, promissory estoppel and breach of contract principles supported liability in damages. The compensation claim was within limitation because it arose on vacating the premises, and an unexplained reduction in damages was unsustainable where the agreed monthly rent supplied the measure of loss. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184358