<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 225 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329627</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 is mandatory before seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 129A. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s request for condonation of a 1091-day delay, stating that compliance with Section 129E must precede any appeal filing. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the post-amendment provisions of Section 129E and outlined the sequence of actions required for appellants in similar situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 225 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329627</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled that compliance with Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962 is mandatory before seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal under Section 129A. The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s request for condonation of a 1091-day delay, stating that compliance with Section 129E must precede any appeal filing. The judgment emphasized the importance of adhering to the post-amendment provisions of Section 129E and outlined the sequence of actions required for appellants in similar situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>