https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329622 The High Court allowed the petitioner, a manufacturer dealer of glass items, to pursue the first appeal before the Appellate Authority by fulfilling the predeposit condition of Rs. 4,00,000. The Court emphasized the petitioner's entitlement to claim the concessional rate of duty as a seller to a registered dealer, irrespective of the actions of the purchasing dealer. The Court reversed the Tribunal's order, setting aside the dismissal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority, and directed a fair examination of the disputed issues during the appeal process. The deposited amount was considered sufficient, and the appeal was reinstated for further consideration. en-us Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:54:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329622 The High Court allowed the petitioner, a manufacturer dealer of glass items, to pursue the first appeal before the Appellate Authority by fulfilling the predeposit condition of Rs. 4,00,000. The Court emphasized the petitioner's entitlement to claim the concessional rate of duty as a seller to a registered dealer, irrespective of the actions of the purchasing dealer. The Court reversed the Tribunal's order, setting aside the dismissal of the appeal by the Appellate Authority, and directed a fair examination of the disputed issues during the appeal process. The deposited amount was considered sufficient, and the appeal was reinstated for further consideration. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 10 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=329622