<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 986 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184352</link>
    <description>The Allahabad HC directed the standing counsel to file a counter affidavit within four weeks and allowed a rejoinder affidavit within three weeks in connection with Writ Petition No.1792 of 2009. Penalty proceedings against the petitioner were temporarily halted as the petitioner raised concerns about conflicting court judgments and sought resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 13:21:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=434020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 986 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184352</link>
      <description>The Allahabad HC directed the standing counsel to file a counter affidavit within four weeks and allowed a rejoinder affidavit within three weeks in connection with Writ Petition No.1792 of 2009. Penalty proceedings against the petitioner were temporarily halted as the petitioner raised concerns about conflicting court judgments and sought resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>