https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184350 Consumer forum jurisdiction was available for a passenger's claim arising from loss of luggage and bodily injury during a train journey, because the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides an additional remedy and the absence of a specific objection did not bar consideration of the complaint. On liability, the railway administration was held responsible for deficiency in service where the record showed prior knowledge of repeated mob violence on the route and no reasonable preventive measures had been taken. The passenger's loss and injuries were not effectively controverted, and the award of compensation was restored after the appellate order failed to dislodge the State Commission's findings or give adequate reasons. en-us Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:47:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184350 Consumer forum jurisdiction was available for a passenger's claim arising from loss of luggage and bodily injury during a train journey, because the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides an additional remedy and the absence of a specific objection did not bar consideration of the complaint. On liability, the railway administration was held responsible for deficiency in service where the record showed prior knowledge of repeated mob violence on the route and no reasonable preventive measures had been taken. The passenger's loss and injuries were not effectively controverted, and the award of compensation was restored after the appellate order failed to dislodge the State Commission's findings or give adequate reasons. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=184350